Now you’d think that a “gear” site like planet5D wouldn’t have a desire to tell you to stop being a pixel peeper or a gear head, but there’s a lot of validity to this rant that was posted on PetaPixel and I’d just like you to think about it (but don’t stop coming here daily LOL). By the way, I know some of you think of us as only a gear site (I’ve heard you say it) but our main goal is to educate (which often includes gear, but we like to help you learn plenty of other things too!)
But realistically, this isn’t anything new for me. If you have ever listened to one of Deejay’s DSLR FILM NOOB podcasts where I am semi-co-host, you will hear me rant about this quite often actually.
I know it is a lot of fun to talk about new gear and 2 debate which camera is”better” but we all know that the best camera is the one you have (especially if you know how to use it well).
And another thing about reading on online debates about which camera is better, we often learn something new. I know that often I learne something from other people that maybe I was not aware of by reading such debates, But the bashing that happens is not something I'm in favor of either. I wish we could all just get along and learn from each other.
That being said, I happen to love my Canon EOS 5D Mark IV and I agree with the author that it does have better dynamic range than previous Canon 5Ds, and maybe it isn't quite as good as Sony or Nikon, but I am happy with what I have and I'm learning how to use it. I am so excited about the Canon EOS 5D Mark IV that I’ve gone into a lot more depth about the menus and features of the camera, and guess what? That’s making me a better photographer/filmmaker. And that’s a good thing!
Rant: We Photographers Have Lost Our North, Stop the Endless Gear Debates
Here’s the before/after shot I promised yesterday which showcases the not-too-shabby dynamic range and noise control of the Canon EOS 5D Mark IV. But I don’t want to talk about it any longer. Instead, I’d like to say this.
Endless debates about the dynamic range, noise, pixel counting, brand wars and what-not are misplaced. A waste of breath and energy. We, the photographers, have lost our North.
I am guilty, you’re all guilty. We’ve forgotten the things that really matter in our craft. Ansel Adams, Henri Cartier-Bresson, Andy Warhol and the living legends like Annie Liebowitz and Sebastião Salgado— who cares which cameras were used to capture their legendary works? NO ONE.
Photography was never and will never be about the silly tools we use. It was and is and always will be about the people that use them. Speaking of which, our cameras today are immeasurably better than anything our peers and pioneers used just a decade ago, let alone 50 years ago.
Have you ever looked at the close-ups of the greatest photos made a few decades ago? The lowest-end phone today takes better photos than some ‘professional’ cameras could 20 years ago. So let’s agree please to stop idolizing the brands and worshipping the technical specs. Let’s celebrate the artists and the art itself instead.
|Note: it is our policy to give credit as well as deserved traffic to our news sources – so we don't repost the entire article – sorry, I know you want the juicy bits, but I feel it is only fair that their site get the traffic and besides, you just might make a new friend and find an advertiser that has something you've never seen before|
(cover photo credit: snap from PetaPixel)
Latest posts by planetMitch (see all)
- Free Soloing El Capitan – A bit about how they filmed it - February 18, 2019
- Camera & Flask – Great Filmmaking Podcast - February 18, 2019
- Boycott the Oscars ** UPDATED – We Won - February 15, 2019