Magic Lantern Canon EOS 5D Mark III RAW video vs Blackmagic Cinema Camera!

by planetMitchLeave a Comment

In a post late yesterday, the cinema5D team posted a Canon EOS 5D Mark III Magic Lantern alpha vs. Blackmagic Cinema Camera short that will amaze you.

Please make sure to read yesterday's “Updates on the RAW video progress from Magic Lantern for the Canon EOS 5D Mark III” and “First Magic Lantern RAW video short shot on Canon EOS 5D Mark III released” posts for more info on this Magic Lantern Canon EOS 5D Mark III alpha software.

I think you'll see the Canon EOS 5D Mark III looks very much like the Blackmagic Cinema Camera! Now you'll have the best of both worlds in one camera.

This is indeed pretty amazing!


Canon 5D mark III RAW vs. Blackmagic Cinema Camera RAW

More info on the test

See the related article on cinema5D:
cinema5d.com/news/?p=17976

This is how we hacked the 5D: c5d.at/1o4

Today we already published a test video of the impressive Canon 5D mark III RAW module enabled by the Magic Lantern hack and a guide to get it working yourself.

Here's a side by side comparison of the 5D mark III with 14bit RAW 1080p together with the Blackmagic Cinema Camera with 2.5K RAW so you can see how the two cameras differ.

What we did:

We went out with a Canon 5D mark III that had the Magic Lantern RAW module hack on it and shot with the Blackmagic Cinema Camera in RAW mode alongside.

We used the Canon 24-105mm lens on the 5D while we used the Tokina 16-50mm on the Blackmagic. Native ISO on the Blackmagic is 800 so we used that.

We tried to get similar shots. It's not so easy, in fact it was easier to get the shots on the 5D as the Blackmagic is just not a very easy to use camera in many regards. Wrongly interpreted zebra indicators had me fooled several times and the internal battery almost died.

Post processing

After a lengthy process of getting the RAW files converted into something usable we graded both to match more or less. We didn't do a very sophisticated grade, working with RAW files like that is time consuming.

What became clear is that both cameras provide very similarly capable RAW files. You can adjust everything and everything is possible. You can get similar details out of the sky and set all you like in post. Color temperature, tint, dynamic range, no problem. The 5D is just as strong as the BMCC, providing maybe a bit more dynamic range.

Where the cameras differ in terms of RAW is one big thing: Noise. The 5D mark III can shoot indoors at ISO 1600 and there's almost no noise while the Blackmagic starts to get ugly at this point.
The noise from the BMCC is also apparent when raising the blacks in a shot.

Moire and aliasing is another big big issue on Blackmagic and there is very litte of that on the 5D RAW. The cleanness of the shots of the 5D RAW in general is extremely pleasing and jumps at you when you sit in front of the RAW images. Check some of the dng's yourself in our other post.

Conclusion

The 5D RAW has the clear advantage of a large sensor and never before seen ISO performance on a RAW camera. It's intriguing and soon a stable version will probably be ready for real usage.
On the downside the 5D RAW has a little less detail than the Blackmagic or an Alexa, but a lot more detail than the 5D had without the RAW hack.

We'll keep you posted on the progress of the Magic Lantern solution.

If you buy a Canon 5D mark III, please get it HERE: goo.gl/CvPsN to reward our efforts and PLEASE ALSO MAKE SURE YOU DONATE TO MAGIC LANTERN FOR MAKING THIS AWESOME DEVELOPMENT POSSIBLE: goo.gl/k9VdI

Music provided by The Music Bed: themusicbed.com/
Blake Ewing – Revolution

(cover photo credit: snap from the video)


Additional Stories You Will Want To Read:

Leave a Comment