broadcast

Nikon D4 & D800 – first DSLR cameras to pass the EBU broadcast test

by SimonBailey10 Comments

In his first blog post for planet5D, Simon Bailey addresses an interesting point that we’ve heard very little about Nikon cameras and the EBU broadcast video tests. Learn more about Simon in his bio at the bottom of the article.

Nikon D4 & D800 – first DSLR cameras fit for broadcast

Update… we earlier reported incorrectly that the Nikons had been approved by the BBC – the EBU broadcast test is often referred to as “the BBC test” – the BBC is not saying they approved the Nikon D4 and Nikon D800. We were asked to remove the statements about the BBC from the article by the BBC. We apologize for the error.


MyNikonLife

From the myNikonLife news

Nikon’s pro range reaches new heights this week as the D4 and D800 have opened an important door into the professional video broadcasting market. Both models have become the first DSLR cameras to pass the very elaborate European Broadcasting Union (EBU) test.

These tests were conducted by Alan Roberts, who spent most of his career in research and development at the BBC and wrote the new EBU guidelines and testing procedures. Alan commented that both the D4 and D800 exhibited the lowest amount of rolling shutter he has ever seen in a CMOS equipped camera. He also commented that the exposure latitudes of the D4 were truly remarkable at around 13 stops; a figure only bettered by top grade LS rated cameras.

It seems both the Nikon D4 & D800 are on a winning streak, with the duo recently picking up awards such as TIPA Best Expert DSLR 2012, GP2012 Camera of the Year & European Camera of the Year 2012. This further showcases the strength of Nikon’s superior technology across both photography and film.

For an in depth report on how both the D4 and D800 performed in the EBU test, click here.

 

Simon’s take

The importance of this announcement by the EBU and Nikon isn’t so much Nikon‘s achievement, but that DSLR’s are being viewed as viable options within the broadcast industry.

The reports don’t seem to indicate that the uncompressed 4:2:2 HDMI output of the D4 & D800 were the reason for passing the tests so its reasonable to assume we will see other DSLR’s from other manufacturers joining their ranks in time.

While the reports both commend strengths and point out weaknesses of both camera’s, both met enough of the test requirements to pass. The D800‘s last line of the report “This camera cannot be recommended for serious programme-making” is unclear of the context

Neither of the reports say failed. Both have pros and cons and the “not recommended for serious programme-making” line is a recommendation for just what it says and doesn’t mean it failed.  There are many tiers within the EBU that cameras fit into and that line seems to indicate it doesn’t fit into the LS tier.

tech.ebu.ch/camtest

The important thing to take away from this, is not this brand or that brand but that DSLR’s are at least getting a look at.

These were not the first DSLR’s to be tested by the EBU.  Also worth noting was the tested 13 stop dynamic range tested of the D4 and 12 stops for the D800, both using just the standard colour profiles.

Its a win for all DSLR shooters and manufacturers in the long run.

Simon Bailey is an award-winning filmmaker and commercial director. With almost 20 years experience in a range of roles within the broadcast and film environments, Simon’s always keen to help where he can.

Gear Guide - Pop up- v2

Free Essential Gear Guide

It’s easy to get sucked into the vortex that is “gear.” In this definitive guide, we share some pretty solid gear that is professional enough to take a client’s location without being embarrassed and won’t put you in massive debit. 

Your download will be available after you confirm - see your inbox!

Comments

  1. danap

    The D800 FAILED in the test. This is the plain truth. No much aliasin, moire and too little resolution – only 1,355×764 more or less 720p. That is the truth,. Quote “The camera has very limited controls when in video mode, but has reasonable connectivity, allowing full- resolution external monitoring and recording. Sound facilities are sparse, the internal microphone is adequate for note-taking or guide sound, and the microphone connector is a 3.5mm jack offering only un-balanced input.
    The test procedures were as described and recommended by the EBU, in Tech 3335 (tech.ebu.ch/docs/tech/tech3335.pdf). Video performance is not really acceptable at 1080p, much less so at 720p. Even though the sensor has 36.8 million photo-sites, it achieves only about 1,355×764, little better than 1,280×720.
    Figure 9 Sharpening (a) level 0 (minimum) (b) level 9 (maximum)
    Figure 9 Sharpening (a) level 2 (b) level 4
    7
    Noise levels are very low, even with ISO settings up to 6,400. Significant coloured spatial aliasing is always present, and is clearly visible even on the camera’s LCD display (921k pixels, about 1,176×784). In theory, meticulous control of the shooting style can reduce this but is unlikely to eliminate it, by using only motivated pans together with fairly short depth of field, such that detail out of the focused plane is always soft and therefore can never provoke aliasing. Exposure range is, potentially, as high as 12 stops, although this will be limited by the acceptability of the noise levels near black.
    Colour performance is good, and the camera does not respond to infra-red illumination. Motion portrayal is good, the effects of the rolling shutter are nicely suppressed. This camera cannot be recommended for serious programme-making.”

    1. Author
      SimonBailey

      Neither of the reports say failed. Both have pros and cons and the “not recommended for serious programme-making” line is a recommendation for just what it says and doesn’t mean it failed. There are many tiers within the EBU that cameras fit into and that line seems to indicate it doesn’t fit into the LS tier.

      tech.ebu.ch/camtest

      I should add this was an EBU report and not a BBC report.

      The important thing to take away from this, is not this brand or that brand but that DSLR’s are at least getting a look at.

  2. Larry Vaughn

    Misleading info from planet 5d considering the actual results of the test.

    Please, don’t you care about your credibility?

    1. planetMitch

      We do care. We have posted an update. We misreported that the BBC had approved them. The EBU tests are commonly called the “BBC tests”.

      The line from the Nikon story we were focused on was this:

      Both models have become the first DSLR cameras to pass the very elaborate European Broadcasting Union (EBU) test, commonly referred to as the BBC Test.

  3. Pingback: Nikon DSLRs ‘Pass’ BBC Broadcast Test, iPhone Used for Live BBC Interview

  4. Eduardo

    Wow Mitch, you really got my hopes up. Errors do happen to the best of us and you corrected the information right away. I for one really appreciate the effort you put into this site. Keep up the good work.

  5. Pingback: Nikon D4 & D800 - first DSLR cameras to pass the EBU broadcast tests | planet5D - the best DSLR video community on the planet! | Video For Real Estate | Scoop.it

  6. gerry

    Mitch, maybe this will inspire you to do a little more research before posting. I would also remove yourself from the posts, you are kind of annoying and need to learn how to interview people without making it about yourself.

    1. planetMitch

      Gerry – thanks for your comments. First, the post was written by Simon, not me. Second, I don’t understand your last point.

  7. Pete

    Well it’s obvious that the ‘uproar’ here (especially the first post) comes because this is not a ‘Canon’ centric post. Mitch, I know this is ‘Planet 5D’ but thanks for posting stuff about ‘better’ cameras :-p

Leave a Comment